Planet X aka Niburu Some Are Saying Might Not Exist

there is a HUGE BUZZ from astronomers about it…

Astronomers who announced a possible large planet at the edge of our solar system are being debated.  What is hardly debated is that something is there.  Yesterday the two astronomers confirmed some very strong anomolies in the kuiper belt that would make it mathematically extremely likely for a large object to be there!  However, they have yet to observe it with a telescope and said they are certain within 5 years or less they or someone else would.  What is also interesting is that there have been rumors on the web for a long time about such a planet as well as certain characteristics.  Who is right?  Is this a known object or just a coincidence?

Let’s find out more about it on page 2

Next Page »



21 Comments

  1. Eric Myers said:

    The theory has been around awhile. Since the 30s I believe.
    This is the first time data has added up.
    I imagine there’s lots of hesitation on confirming the planet. It could confirm the Sumerians weren’t nuts. If it’s there it could change the way ancient text are looked at. A game changer of sorts

  2. Mike Saul said:

    Planet x is completly seperate from Niburu….just saying Nibiru only came by earth every 36000 years supposedly. Planet x is supposed to be the planet past pluto.. I might be off a little on the years but the same point applies.

  3. John Roberts said:

    the planet is there. the asteroid gravity data clearly shows the gravitational evidence for it being there. Not enough light makes it through the oort cloud and you can’t see it with a normal, or any modern telescope.

  4. Mike Guay said:

    Then they must explain the observed orbital perturbations observed in the Oort Cloud. Perturbations which were predicted by a computer model and predicted the existence of Niburu.
    The fact is that “Something” of great mass exists out there and it’s Gravity is effecting its neighbors,if not a planetary object, then what?

  5. Eric Myers said:

    The book of En-Ki clearly describes saturns rings, jupiters red spot, Mars and the astroid belt.
    5,000 years ago.
    Even with a big telescope you can’t see the astroid belt.
    So you have to believe that someone saw this stuff in order for it to be written down in cuneiform

  6. Adam Borowiak said:

    Undereducated? You don’t have to be under educated to express ones opinion. It’s what I call kiss my$#%&!@*if hurt your feelings.

  7. David Rinaldi said:

    All speculation… I’ve seen Nirabu “facts” at 3600 years, and I’ve seen this planets rotation estimated at 20000 years…

    It’s all a bunch of$#%&!@* and when they spot the thing in a telescope, that’s when I’ll believe it’s wormwood…

  8. Joe Komodi said:

    Has anybody ever thought that the object could be something different than a planet?

    A planet of that size would have already likely been detected… Which means its likely not large in size, but large in mass, which would give it the same gravitational charactersitics as a large planet… But given the orbit the hypothesize, it doesnt seem like it is a candidate to have been ‘made’ by our solar system.

    Two objects come to mind.

    A white dwarf star that has cooled and has free-floated, only to be caught in the Sun’s gravity (extrmely dense, small size) OR a small black hole.

  9. Scott Brown said:

    From what I’ve read about it, it takes 15,000 years to complete its orbit and doesn’t intrude in past the Kuiper Belt. Or at least they don’t think it does

  10. Mike Saul said:

    I read something about it passing by earth and mars. Which is what caused the scar on mars. But niw because of spacial growth it passes by earth at a distance but still close enough to witness the mass. Im gonna double check on the years and post it once I get a confirmation on it.

*

*

Top