Theory That Black Holes Don’t Exist – Part 2 NASA Weighs In

This is gaining traction…

What do you think?

Most astronomers and space fans alike have a fascination with black holes. They seem to defy the laws of the physics that we think we understand. However, there is a new theory that they potentially don’t exist. Wait…what? yes you read that correctly. Astrophysicists Laura Mersini-Houghton and Herald P. Pfeiffer have come to a different conclusion that may surprise you.

They used computer modeling to try to disrupt the theory and here is more on what they found out:

The only way to get a better understanding of black holes, therefore, is through computer models that simulate the process of how a massive star explodes and the remaining core collapses in on itself, creating a black hole. But recently, Mersini-Houghton, from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Pfeiffer, at the University of Toronto, discovered something surprising when working out their stellar-collapse models: black holes can’t form, which then led them to the astounding conclusion that black holes don’t exist.

“I’m still not over the shock,” said Mersini-Houghton in a statement released by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “We’ve been studying this problem for a more than 50 years and this solution gives us a lot to think about.”

We’re not 100% convinced but this is the video from part 1:

THIS is the latest update with a confirmation of at least part of the evidence from none other than NASA”:

According to him, the black holes are actually ultra hot balls of fire like our Sun and they don’t really exist. And NASA has confirmed it.

NASA announced that two of its space telescopes caught a supermassive black hole in the midst of a giant eruption of X-ray light. This giant eruption seemed to have been triggered by the eruption of a huge corona (charged particles) from the “black hole”.

Which left many scientists puzzled: If nothing can exit a black hole, how could a corona come out of it?

With this question puzzling the scientists, it confirms Abhas Mitra’s theory.

Whoa what do you think about this?  This astronomer has a background from Mumbai and he poses a disruptive topic of discussion which changes everything if true.

thanks to business insider for the info

thanks to arvix.org for the study



10 Comments

  1. Eric Myers said:

    If true, and that’s a big if. Will someone explain what’s the gravitational force holding spiral galaxies together.
    And what about the indirect evidence that’s been collected?
    Not to mention it disqualifies a lot of research in the field.
    Her math must be wrong.

  2. Dwayne Farmer said:

    Just a guess, but can the black part of the hole be where the particles going into them exceed the speed of light? That’s what it looked like to me.

  3. John Brewer said:

    Exactly, math has to be incorrect or incomplete. Strongest indirect evidence: observing stars near the center of galaxies get whipped around some type of gravitationally immense object at incredible speeds. Further indirect but indisputable evidence, scientist have witnessed stars being devoured by gravitationally superior unseen objects. Unsure how correct math could dispute such certain evidence.

  4. Mike Guay said:

    Something is pulling in all that gas, dust, planets, stars and entire solar systems.
    If not a gravitational singularity, then what?

  5. Corey Bryan said:

    What is the real answer, are there black holes or not?! I just read an article saying that it is possible to retrieve information in minute scales from a black hole. And another showing a black hole eating a star!
    Please she’d some light …no pun intended haha

*

*

Top