
this is a trippy concept..
The concept is very out there and the ever inquisitive “VSauce” walks us through.
It may be difficult to get your mind around this.
The narrator does a thoroughly good job of this and it involves thinking about 3 dimensional plains in a new way. Once commenter even says:
I lost you after like 6 minutes
Some one else has a similar comment:
17 minutes in and i’m just here like, what is he talking about…
Here is a bit more information from wikipedia on the background of this theorem:
The Banach–Tarski paradox is a theorem in set-theoreticgeometry, which states the following: Given a solid ball in 3‑dimensional space, there exists a decomposition of the ball into a finite number of disjointsubsets, which can then be put back together in a different way to yield two identical copies of the original ball. Indeed, the reassembly process involves only moving the pieces around and rotating them, without changing their shape. However, the pieces themselves are not “solids” in the usual sense, but infinite scatterings of points. The reconstruction can work with as few as five pieces.[1]
Let’s find out more about this amazing paradox in this video on page 2
Next Page »

The Vsauce channel on YouTube has a really good video about this.
Maybe Star Trek will make a movie based on this.
Yes, i read about it around a year ago
I feel like this gets posted once or twice a month by these guys ._. Must really love this article
I read ‘Tarski Paradox’ as Tardis Box ._.
An exercise in futility
Lily Huinck
Reminiscent of Jesus feeding 5000, eh?
Thought porn. It gets you all excited but in the end it’s really worthless.