Possible Spotting Of “Planet” X – Latest Update

This is a continuation of the excerpt from wikipedia:

Clyde Tombaugh‘s discovery of Pluto in 1930 appeared to validate Lowell’s hypothesis, and Pluto was officially named the ninth planet. In 1978, Pluto was conclusively determined to be too small for its gravity to affect the giant planets, resulting in a brief search for a tenth planet.

Now remember, even before this latest discovery astronomers thought something might be there!  THAT may in a sense be additional evidence in that something is there because they did not even have the tools we do now!

Check back for updates as they come in.  Here are two different videos about it and one has a cool simulation of its orbit!

thanks to dispatchtribunal.com for the great info

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ov4EKOSea48



77 Comments

  1. Mark Kyler said:

    Planets are flat????? Ridiculous. What would NASA gain from making us think planets are round ? Look through a telescope and see for yourself.

  2. Mark Kyler said:

    Your right. I personally think the Sumerian writings are true. For ancient people to write about space travel DNA manipulation, test tube babies etc. wouldn’t be something they could have made up.

  3. Jimmy DiFrancesco said:

    Yeah that’s pretty much where flat earth crumbles from the go. Everything in nature is in attempt to form a sphere, only nullified by forces. Why they agree that’s true for everything except the earth, i don’t know that they even try to explain that. And it should kinda be the first hurtle. There’s lots of ‘conspiracies’ that are more likely to be valid than not, so why they go against natural formation beats the hell outta me.

  4. Mark Kyler said:

    I watched a couple videos on it with an open mind and it is absolutely stupid. A plane can take off in California and fly West and end up back in California. They say it’s because “The government has GPS rigged” but the first flight around the world happened before GPS lol

  5. Jimmy DiFrancesco said:

    Yeah it’s like pacman for them lol. I did however look at the “hollow earth” map. I mean, I don’t go for it, but to be honest..it was REALLY entertaining to look at i admit. lol

  6. Crystal Meuse said:

    It’s not like any of us are gonna be able to fly out there and find out ourselves by seeing it “with our own eyes. It’s so hard to believe what you read. Gotta look at the source and decide whether they are credible or not.

  7. Sammy Solano said:

    What reputable scientists can you cite that believe this horse shìt?

    There are numerous technologies that not only confirm that this planet is spherical, but they RELY on the math that confirms it, in order to function properly. While not perfectly spherical by any means, all planets are spherical for various natural, physical and observable reasons. Lest you also ignore the various independent scientists and students that have flown drones with cameras high up in the atmosphere and shown the footahe of obvious curvature.

  8. Colin Almquist said:

    In a flat earth scenario, you’re saying that gravity is just a downward force over a flat plane. However, all the planets are revolving around the sun, no? Is gravity some how different for them?

  9. Justin Allen said:

    Who said I believe in gravity over a flat plane? Who said I believe in gravity at all? Density accounts for why we are grounded to the surface, and its not heliocentrism we are geocentric

  10. Tom Schilling said:

    Justin, your claims are horse$#%&!@* Go to New Zealand and take a picture of the moon, then go to North America and take a picture of the moon in the exact same phase and come back here with your results. On your way across the equator, snap another picture, just let us know your results. If the results don’t give you proof of a globe, then you’re just not intelligent enough to understand anything and shouldn’t make such ridiculous claims without being made fun of for being clueless. And that doesn’t even touch on the rest of so many ways to observe the earth is a globe without having to leave its surface.

  11. Rachel Jenkins said:

    It’s the same old, same old. They know a planet is out there, but they haven’t actually seen it yet. They predict they will have pictures of the “Planet X” in 5 years time, give or take.

  12. Rachel Jenkins said:

    Lol me too. Last time I researched too far into “Planet X”, I was afraid for our lives for months! Never again, until proof.

  13. Joshua Page said:

    So how in the hell is it that we can see$#%&!@*in other galaxies but we can see a “planet” right out side our own.. just don’t add up

*

*

Top