
Here is the more complicated astronomical evidence they used to come to this conclusion:
Batygin and Brown inferred its presence from the peculiar clustering of six previously known objects that orbit beyond Neptune. They say there’s only a 0.007% chance, or about one in 15,000, that the clustering could be a coincidence. Instead, they say, a planet with the mass of 10 Earths has shepherded the six objects into their strange elliptical orbits, tilted out of the plane of the solar system.
The orbit of the inferred planet is similarly tilted, as well as stretched to distances that will explode previous conceptions of the solar system. Its closest approach to the sun is seven times farther than Neptune, or 200 astronomical units (AUs). (An AU is the distance between Earth and the sun, about 150 million kilometers.) And Planet X could roam as far as 600 to 1200 AU, well beyond the Kuiper belt, the region of small icy worlds that begins at Neptune’s edge about 30 AU.
Could this actually be or is there some other explanation?
Feel free to comment with your thoughts and check out a video on “Planet X” here:
thanks to sciencemag.org for the great info

Maybe or is. Their is no in between, especially with the telescope we have out there. Witnessing hundreds of other planets, but were just going to give it a maybe….smh either there is or there is not..just saying
Just another Ice planet waiting to be explored.
Some are presenting this statement with a picture of an earth like planet, they are probably smart enough to know better, but I guess they are looking to attract the fools out there.