Can Vortex Mathematics Lead to Free Energy

As expected the comments in regards to a video like this are very spirited.  Here are some that stand out!

Batfly had this to say about the skeptics:

With extraordinary claims comes the requirement for rigorous and extraordinary evidence. Bring on the debunkers welcome them.  It’s not like this is the first claim of free energy.  Let’s see the evidence.  I am interested.

And the following in regards to the question of 3,6,9 significance was answered on quora:

  1. A circle has 360 degrees. (3+6+0=9)
  2. Semicircle has 180 degrees. (1+8+0=9)
  3. One fourth of circle has 90 degrees. (9+0=9)
  4. 45 degree (4+5=9)
  5. 22.5 degree. (2+2+5=9)
  6. 11.25 degree (1+1+2+5=9)

Very interesting stuff if nothing else.  We hope you like the video.

thanks for the info! www.tblnfilms.com/rdonutsmovie

thanks to disinfo.com for the great info

thanks to quora



22 Comments

  1. Nicholas Faupel said:

    The simplest path to free energy is leverage. We’ve been using pulleys and levers for ages. You input x energy and get output 10x energy. What’s so complicated to believe we can’t come up with something..

  2. Mike Guerrein said:

    What sort of proof can you provide that the Egyptians had anything even remotely like this, or any other sort of advance technology for that matter…?

  3. Adam Waller said:

    Well, I can’t give you Egyptian tech, but what I CAN do is point you to historical fact. Research Otis T. Carr. Somewhat of a protege to Nikola. Anti- gravity was partly achieved at an amazing 89%. The U.S govt. seized his assets claiming his discovery would “cripple the international monetary trade”

  4. Adam Waller said:

    It’s ok to doubt, Mike. It’s not okay to take an immediate stance against something and ask for proof that you know isn’t there, while forgetting that you also have no proof to the contrary.

  5. Mike Guerrein said:

    I don’t need to prove anything whatsoever. I’m not the one making claims. The burden of proof is on the one making the claims. That being said, there is indeed large amounts of proof that ancient civilizations, like the Egyptians, used fairly simple (albeit quite innovative) techniques to accomplish some very impressive things. You see, all of this speculation about ancient high-tech, ancient aliens, etc. is just that, speculation; it has never made it beyond the hypothesis stage. Where as the speculations about the ancient humans using simple, yet innovative, technology; is a full blown theory. There is evidence to support it, it can be reproduced experimentally, and has yet to be proven wrong. It’s the difference between pseudoscience and actual science…

  6. Jared Bock said:

    Even if it does unlock free energy, the petroleum industry will buy all of the patents and lock it away in a safe somewhere. There are countless alternatives to petroleum that we are completely unaware of.

  7. Mitchell Matthews said:

    All golden artifacts that turned out to be finely gold PLATED, which requires ELECTRICITY. The Wardenclyff of Tesla’s closely resembles the inner workings of the Great pyramid, using aquifers to ground them both. The “ankh” was a receiver for telecommunications and there are many hieroglyphs that show antennas.

  8. Mike Guerrein said:

    Mitchell Matthews “ELECTRICITY” as you put it was easily achieved the same way then as we do now, with chemical batteries. It’s a very simple process to electroplate with gold and the technology has been around for literally thousands of years. You bring up “the inner workings of the Great pyramid” which have been shown, in a working model, to exists as a clever set of steps and pathways with the sole purpose of getting the cap stone up to the top of the pyramid. “The “ankh” was a receiver for telecommunications” is pure speculation without supporting evidence. In fact, it’s actually the hieroglyphic symbol for “life”. ” there are many hieroglyphs that show antennas.” No there aren’t… There are hieroglyphics that have things that may resemble antennas, but there is literally zero evidence to say that is what we are looking at. It’s called pareidolia, and it’s the same reason you see shapes in the clouds, or Jesus on a piece of toast…

  9. John Gadient said:

    Free energy is completely impossible in a capitalist society. It costs money just to talk about it. There cannot be free energy. It’s silly to try.

  10. John Gadient said:

    Tesla did not produce free energy. His experiment failed and he realized that jacking up the planet with electricity could destroy the whole planet. Tesla did not create free energy. That part of tesla makes no sense. He goes from science to politics in one breath. Strange.

*

*

Top