Guy Discusses “Vortex Based Mathematics” and Makes a Bold Statement

As expected the comments in regards to a video like this are very spirited.  Here are some that stand out!

Batfly had this to say about the skeptics:

With extraordinary claims comes the requirement for rigorous and extraordinary evidence. Bring on the debunkers welcome them.  It’s not like this is the first claim of free energy.  Let’s see the evidence.  I am interested.

And the following in regards to the question of 3,6,9 significance was answered on quora:

  1. A circle has 360 degrees. (3+6+0=9)
  2. Semicircle has 180 degrees. (1+8+0=9)
  3. One fourth of circle has 90 degrees. (9+0=9)
  4. 45 degree (4+5=9)
  5. 22.5 degree. (2+2+5=9)
  6. 11.25 degree (1+1+2+5=9)

Very interesting stuff if nothing else.  We hope you like the video.

 

thanks for the info! www.tblnfilms.com/rdonutsmovie

thanks to quora



Pages: 1 2

7 Comments

  1. John Roberts said:

    . It is confirmed numerically that an optical toroidal dipolar moment dominates over other moments. This response is characterized by a strong confinement of an E-field component at the toroid center, oriented perpendicular to the H-vortex plane. The resonance-enhanced optical toroidal response can provide an experimental avenue for various interesting optical phenomena associated with the elusive toroidal moment.

    http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/apl/101/14/10.1063/1.4757613

    Reply
  3. Joel Ferguson said:

    Please excuse my limited understanding, from what I gather creating a counter vortex within an active vortex cancels out where the two vortex interact creating a frequency enhancing radio telescopes, similar to the experimental telescope in Howard the Duck?

    Reply

*

*

Top