some think this make sense…do you?
From stories about binary code to Einstein’s gravity theories, this time travel perspective may make sense. Stephen Hawking may be the most famous current scientist and theoretical astrophysicist. Gosh that is a lot of syllables.
And you may or may not have seen the video about 11 dimensions. Is that possible and is that related to Stephen Hawking’s time travel theories or is it unrelated and too “out there”?
Most people “perceive” of time as the 4th dimension…length, width, depth and then motion or movement in sequence at least as we understand it.
Let’s check out this bizarre video on what this famous scientist thinks about time travel on page 2
Next Page »
Pages: 1 2
In this vast universe nothing is impossible,there are portal doors to be open and to travel through.But first we have discover and learn so much more from mother earth before we can travel trough the universe.
http://www.theeventchronicle.com/study/the-secret-cia-time-travel-program/
What type of bull$#%&!@*is the video made of… This makes no sence at all… Where are they getting these numbers from 6 yrs to travel light speed?? 1 day of light speed is 1 yr earth time??.. This makes sense … A days a day a years a year no matter how fucking fast you go… And on that matter going fast doesn’t let you go in the past or the future your always in the present.. This is a theory not factual… Same as life after death..
Particles have been sent back in time
U will have to travel faster then light….
I cant see no time travel what is ..is…lol
No
Joel Dawkins
Will never happen
Daniel Rodriguez
Check out the double slit experiment they have proved that electrons can and do travel back in time
Two dimension is the object and the perspective looking at it.
Three dimension is two eyes or more looking at an object to discern distance.
Any further dimensions are science fiction or sifi theory.
Reading this article is time that I won’t get back. Thanks.
of course you can travel time. looking at stars, you are looking into the past. traveling faster than someone else puts you in their future
Sorry don’t believe in time travel
Time Travel would have a negative impact, if you change the past, you change the future and not for the good!
Time travel is not possible because time does not exist – nor is speed of light ever exist. Travel distances in ‘time’ is travelling in Alternate Space – where objective reality is an illusion.
He keeps proving himself wrong, so you tell me.
Scientists will anything never possible to time travel…. In past may be possible to go in future but never in past….. In hindu mythological future time travel asking.
You can travel into the future, that is proven every day. It’s called time dilation. Moving into the past is only complicated mathematically for one sole reason, a paradox is created. If you go back in time and you shoot yourself before entering the time machine, then who killed you?
If Hawking thinks this it won’t work. He’s not right about most things.
Have you ever seen dune I will guide you
Doubtfully
KNOT!
Possibly
How the$#%&!@*would we know if it hasn’t been done?
yes you can cross over any time your ready..but you can’t come back.
Hell…I thought Buck Rogers made sense.
If it takes four years to reach the speed of light (if speed of light do exist) and another four years to decelerate and stopped the spacecraft – then it is totally unrelated to time travel. That’s turbo space travel. Past – Present – Future exist simultaneously in one single brief MOMENT. ‘Time ‘ travel forward through Plains Of Existence – like the pages of a book. It is possible to travel forward from the THE Moment to the SAME Moment of another Plain of Existence. Using the pages of the book as an analogy. An individual depart – at 10.00 am from page 1 would arrived at 10.00 am in page 369. The individual will be standing at the exact spot at the exact time of another Plain of existence (369) A Plain of existence with a unrelated landscape. He has travelled forward in Space Time. Match the Frequency of the Reality You Want and you cannot help but Get That Reality. This is not philosophy. This is physics. Einstein. It is all about vibrational Frequency. It is about reconfiguration of Energy at Atomic Level.
I don’t understand how if things in space are weightless,how would the size of the ship matter?
No. He is wrong.
It needs to be big to hold all the fuel
Idk about the time travel thing because I personally don’t think it’s
Possible, but ok
It all comes down to an objects mass. When you see astronauts on the ISS moving objects around with ease, it is because the object and the astronaut are “falling” around the planet at the same rate/speed. It would be equivalent to freefalling with a bowling ball, the jumper and the ball would be falling at the same rate, therefore the ball could be moved relatively easily from the viewers perspective, but the mass of the ball remains the same. If you were to take that bowling ball into space and try to throw it, you would encounter Newton’s Third Law……for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. As you threw the ball in one direction, the mass of the ball would exert a force on you and push you back in the opposite direction. The same applies to a spacecraft in space…..you must “throw” something, in this case propellant, out the opposite end of the direction you want to accelerate. This is not to say that it would take much less thrust to move an object in space as opposed to on a celestial body with gravity, because contrary to what many people think, there is gravity in space, although very minute, there is gravity. This is why you see free water gather together into round globular structures. I hope this helps…..
I do understand what you’re saying,but the ship wouldn’t be pushing back to give an opposite reaction to the thrust of the engines.it would already be moving or “falling” around the earth at relatively the same speed as the earths rotation so it should be easier for the engines to push the craft forward,it would be different if the craft was moving in the opposite direction but it’s already in motion.even though there is some gravity in space the ship should be able to take off faster in space with those size engines than it would taking off from a planet which it looked like it was doing in the video.you watch how little bursts they use to move the shuttles or anything else into a position ,it doesn’t take much to move them.now take engines that size compared to the actual size of the ship and the fact that it’s already moving in the direction they’re going to fire the engines,if they do a full burn right from the start they should take off faster than what they showed and get up to top speed sooner.
Dude wiggle faster is the answer. Hahaha! You’ll see one day
Which theory? “I was against time travel, before I was for time travel . .”
that is a good analogy, thanks
Wesley B. Martin it helped me
if Wesley B Martin is correct in saying, that there is always a little gravity even in space ! Then weightlessness is an incorrect term, instead you should be asking if mass matters. That seems to be the better application needed for your question. but he answered both applications, making them easily understandable, at least to me he did.re-read his explanation the answer is there
Thank you Patrick Towers. And Chris Aull, the same principle that makes a 747 look like it is going tofall out of the sky when it is flying the same speed as a F-16 fighter just applied to the relative slow appearing accelerating spacecraft in the video.
You must ask yourself does time really exist or is time something that us humans made what is time
So deep dude.
A place for thoughts to materialize for perception of this flesh and all we experience in this form of life derived of light slowed down into matter.
Coppied and pasted.
Awsome replie Scott White!
I diden’t really copy & paste, lol, hahahahahahahahahaha! thanks!
Only.! ONLY when man can achieve Time PORTALS for EXIT & ENTRY without effecting an affect of hostility.! (Sort of like a microwave putting something in [exit] & taking it out [arrival] and knowing when you’ve arrived).!
The Universe isn’t required to make sense
Run it in a super comp, then waste out time telling us about how were gonna pull off a Star Trek future while trillions in debt..
Just gotta vibe faster