They Just Found New Evidence Regarding “Planet X”

whoa this is AWESOME…

This might just be one of the biggest discoveries in astronomy…ever.  You may have heard of “planet x” some people call it by different names.  it is all but proven to be just at the edge of our solar system from numerous astronomers.  It was the team at Cal Tech that noticed the anomalies when looking in that area.  They also said within 5 years they expect to fully locate it.  And in regards to skeptics, there is a new piece of evidence supporting it being there:

Mike Brown, a planetary astronomer at Caltech University, estimated that the hypothetical ‘Planet Nine’ appears to be circling the Sun on a super-elongated orbit that takes an incredible 10,000 to 20,000 years to complete. And now, thanks to a newly detected Kuiper Belt Object (KBO) that’s acting really strange, Brown says the case for Planet Nine just got a whole lot stronger.

So what do weirdly behaving KBOs have to do with finding a never-before-seen planet in our Solar System? 

Let’s find out what these could have to do with planet x on page 2

Next Page »



102 Comments

  1. Sean Thomas Sydney Davis said:

    We find exoplanets because of their shadow on their sun as they transit in front of the telescope. We will NEVER see the shadow of the planets in OUR OWN solar system that are further from the sun than us. THAT is why it’s easier to find exoplanets…common sense. Or should be….

  2. Andy Sherod said:

    Most exo-planets are discovered by monitoring small peterbences in a stars rotation, or by the slight dimming of a stars radiance during a transit. Neither of these methods work when hunting for planets in our own solar system.

  3. Brandon Kerr said:

    They use satellites to monitor stars, which dim and “wobble” if they have planets orbiting. They can extrapolate the data, like duration and severity of dimming, extent of the wobble, and frequency of light to be able to approximate size, mass, and atmospheric composition of exoplanets. Planets within our solar system can onky be seen if they reflect light back at us. Works well for everything out to neptune, but beyond that, objects are very dim, or completely dark, which makes them difficult to detect. If you’re wondering about pluto, it happens to have a highly reflective surface.

  4. Brandon Kerr said:

    Why would it have aliens? It’s completely dark, and frozen solid. Very strange to ask that at the end of the article

  5. Jim Newransky said:

    There are radio telescopes and telescopes that pick up infrared signals from a planted internal heat. Just have to scan the projected orbit til they find it. a 10k-20k year orbit dictates that it will take awhile to find it

  6. Taylor Barlow said:

    We live in the age of the internet. I don’t think a Google search is that hard. You have pretty much all of human knowledge just a search away. I don’t mean to come across crass but you have the ability to look this up without people doing for you. We live in the information age.

  7. Dustin Wilde said:

    We havent been observing with the teck to see it long enough. It may not come in from its ellipse for another 10000 yrs close nuf to see its gravity effect asteroid belt and such

  8. Rich Doughty said:

    This is the same planetary body they found back in the fifties…. Talked about it in the ’80’s…. And now in 2016 they’ve discovered it.

  9. Rich Doughty said:

    If interested…. Google : pioneer 10, Planet X 1983. I read the article in a time magazine while sitting in my schools library in high school

  10. Kevin Conod said:

    True astronomers have been talking about the possibility, but this is a different object …and nothing’s been discovered yet.

  11. Kevin Conod said:

    It’s one thing to discover large planets close to their stars, its a whole different kettle of fish to duscover a planet that’s so far from the sun. Very large infrared telescopes needed to detect something so cold and dark.

  12. Kevin Conod said:

    I thought it was a reasonable question, as it wouldn’t be easily googled. (Yes he could have googled density but if he knew that he wouldn’t have needed to ask the question – catch 22.)

  13. Kevin Conod said:

    Actually thats the least of itsour worries – gravitational effects from something so far out are negligible. Remember Nibru was made up by fear mongering idiots.

  14. Rich Doughty said:

    So this post isn’t about “planet 9”. Who’s orbit is estimated at 50,000 yrs? Oddly enough…. Those numbers are EXACTLY what was said back in 1983…. By cal tech… No less. ; )

  15. Rich Terven said:

    Really Mr. Kevin Conod and I suppose you had a great rapport and acquaintance with the Sumerians.Give it a rest fear mongering idiots indeed. And as for the gravitational influence being negligible what happens when said planet if it is truly there, comes through the inner solar system hmm? how negligible would it’s gravitational influence be then? Don’t discredit knowledge of the ancients because it doesn’t fit into your tiny bubble of perceived reality. They weren’t stupid people by any means

  16. Teri Larsen said:

    Space is very dark. Very very dark. Sometimes we don’t even see moons around Jupiter (were still finding them, up to 62 now). Objects beyond the belt are seriously hard to detect. The only real way to see distant object is to watch others react.

  17. Brian Verhoeven said:

    There are a couple research projects have have made a planet 9 or 10 next to impossible at this point. One was the gravity data from the Voyager programs that showed no gravimetric force affecting Neptune, so that eliminated a large planet in our subs influence past Neptune. Another project was the double infrared scan of the our system, this eliminated any large heat generating planters like gas giants or dwarf stars out to a distance of 84,000 AU from the sun. Depending on who is writing the story about the hypothetical planet 9 or 10 the planet needs to be at least 10 earths masses in size and needs to be between 300 and 1500 AU out. Keep in mind, Pluto is 39.5 AU from the sun.

  18. Jess Garcia said:

    Looks like people do not know the first thing about astrophysics. Planet X and Planet 9 are two different concepts. Learn some actual physics. The article should say, “PLANET 9” not the ridiculous Planet X. Who writes this crap. geez!

  19. Charles Pearson said:

    Supposed to have passed by in 2014, 2016…..UH, YOU GET THE POINT!!!!
    Way to many supposed to be videos of this, AND YET WE’RE STILL HERE???

Leave a Reply to Taylor Barlow Cancel reply

*

*

Top