Most physisicts and astronomers have taken it as a given that black holes exist. This study claims that they don’t which is a bit shocking. Here is more about their studies:
Black holes are some of the most extreme environments in space ever conceived by science and are also one of the most gripping visual effects in Nolan’s latest blockbuster hit. But according to astrophysicists Laura Mersini-Houghton and Herald P. Pfeiffer, they aren’t real.
This would disrupt a large majority of research and experiments based on this opinion.
Let’s find out more and watch the video on page 2
Next Page »
Pages: 1 2
Well I believe we didn’t land on the moon, partly bc we couldn’t even create a lander in the test runs that didn’t crash and burn. Neil almost died over 5 times having to eject from the landers as they were test landing at air bases. Just check the videos on it. Plus, I mean it was only 1969. Even though the moon itself is apparently still a concept since the formation of our moon doesn’t make sense as to how it became perfectly rounded when two chunks of the earth collided after the earth was impacted throwing those two pieces into orbit. But, and this is a big but, if gravity is the weakest of the 4 forces and black holes are real and caused by gravity then what could the other 3 forces do to the universe? Why are black holes so feared if it’s coming from the weakest of the 4 forces? Why are we wasting our time on something of the weakest and not trying to find out if we are in trouble from the strongest of forces?
Who the hell put this video together? The voice I hear paying my T Mobile bill is more pleasant than that, but really? A star collapses to a finite point and then explodes? Why? If it has enough gravitational force to collapse in the first place, why would it explode all of a sudden? This makes absolutely no sense. If it’s just me, then please, someone explain it to me better than this video tried to.
Very interesting….
Space is a joke.
Sounds like pseudoscience to me.
Cus YouTube told me so……
Black holes do exist. Some are active and some are not. Ours is not.
They can’t model a atom exploding perfectly how do they think they can model a star exploding
The point is there are NO MAGICAL HOLES in space…. The extremely dense dark star in the core of spiral galaxies, IS NOT A HOLE…. there is no wormhole leading to a white hole, no magical portal to another dimension… NO blackhole as hypothesized by Einstein and Hawking…
This shouldn’t be surprising as the Unifying Theory of Physics is still unknown to us. It attempts unify the ideas of Relativity (the gravitational theory of the very large) and Quantum Mechanics (the particle theories of the very small). Mathematically, it breaks down where the two meet, which is at the singularity.
To model something like a black hole in a computer is pretty much 100% mathematical and if the math isn’t there yet, then the computer model will fail.
It’s the same Chapel Hill study….conducted over a few years ago…. it doesn’t imply anything….The findings are based on a theoretical construct that has already been deemed inconclusive based on the premise that singularities do indeed exist beyond the Event horizon, at the center of a black hole…..
General Relativity breaks down at the center of black holes which come in the form of a singularity…..that doesn’t imply that black holes DON’T exist….just means that there’s simply no framework to explain the singularity….and since gravity can’t be quantized, there’s no way of joining Quantum mechanics and General Relativity…..you need another framework which can be verified through observation and measurement…..so far, the best candidate can’t be verified ( string theory)…..
If you believe that everything that Hawking and Einstein said is absolute truth, then you dont truly understand science, remember like a few hundred years ago when we though everything revovled around the earth and that earth was flat…. yeah top minds said that too…. everything is theory and there’s always room for improvement
Black holes may not exist but black hoes most definitely do.
Even the greatest super computer can’t process the data needed to live model a hurricane.. It should be understandable then that it would be difficult to model a black hole.
I knew Hawking was a godless moron.
That’s some bad science and logic right there. “If it looks like demonic possession it’s demonic possession!”
Will, people haven’t thought the earth was flat since the time of the Ancient Greeks.
That’s just a bit of propaganda to say people believed that, so you can call modern people who disagree “flat earthers.”
Havent they created black holes in that high speed colider thing in France….?
The laws of physics break down at the event horizon because the dimension of time no longer exists. You just ain’t gonna be able to model that with what we presently know!
That’s where the Unified Theory ties it all together….
That theory is one of the things that you have to ponder just because it’s kinda mind boggling.
That’s exactly what I thought.
The NON-PEER paper lol.
I was like ….. what?!?
Parker Anderson really don’t understand why they keep posting this same story….its totally irrelevant as far as I’m concerned…..
Way to contribute…
I hope you all endure hours of horrible pain.
Lol they read my comments
See how there’s no data from inside a black hole. I can see a computer having problems simulating one. Lack of understanding how it works doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Facts are facts. There is one at the center of most galaxies. Perhaps the subject needs more study before you try to simulate one
Ok then soopo is there a theroy that disproves hawking or somthing ?
This doesn’t prove or disprove the theory of a black hole being a possibility or impossibility. How do you propose a negative without supporting data? Easy, modify existing equations to fit your theory, a computer model can only function on the information it is fed. I would however give a little more credence to this theory, if 2 conditions were met.
1. An open and obvious peer review
2. A reverse engineering of the proof to support this theory.
This would at least temporarily make it a contender in the study of the existence or nonexistence of Black Holes.
^ what he said. 🙂
I just ran a computer model that proves intelligence and high-end reasoning doesn’t come from running computer models.
But I really like the holographic universe theory, or maybe I’m just seeing what I want :-p
I had an idea that is sort of similar to yours. So you know how they try to explain gravity like having a flat piece of paper and then putting a marble on it, and the paper folds in around the marble? Now imagine a force so great (a black hole in this case) bringing the “paper” down so much that it actually reaches a second piece of paper way below the first. I think it might be the same concept with black holes, perhaps they leak into other universes / dimensions because their mass is so great. Just a thought of course, not at all saying it’s true.
What an amazing point. That makes me say good luck to trying to model a black hole if they can’t even do something as insignificant as a hurricane on earth.
Sounds plausible to me. I love asking questions like this. Honestly anything is possible and just the sheer fact that we’re alive and able to ask these questions in this universe to begin with blows my mind every second. Especially when I look up into the night sky and see all those stars, then the next morning seeing our sun rise. That’s our star. Obviously you know that but still, it’s so amazing. XD sorry lol I’m random.
If quantum computing ever pans out it may be the way to go.
There is a limit to space and time shrinkage, if that limit is broken, the structure or system will be destroyed…This conclusion is right, Black holes are just the maximum contraction of energy-mass, where further contraction to a singularity is an impossible…
Black Holes does not exist. Black Holes are not black. ‘Black Holes’ are structures of collapsed of dense matter in regions of space fabric – like the Oregon Lost Lake – where water are sucked down a huge hole into the subterranean volcanic labyrinth. When a massive star explodes and collapsed on itself – it Does Not necessary mean that a black hole will be formed. The formation of ‘black holes’ depends on the velocity and total concentration of energy mass.
Singularity. Better description in my opinion.
They have always been a theory never based on scientific fact but only theory’s in the minds of scientists. And a theory is only a glorified guess.
Poppycock…and poppycock is real.
Whelp fuckin something is there.
JWST will revealed the existence of Black Holes. For the moment – please wait.
Science is just a good story Terrance McKenna
I always thought that they were just really dense mutation, per say, of what was left from the star. I was always sceptical that it tore a hole in space time.
Not enough science yet to say yay or nay.
Black holes matter. Some of them…anti matter
There is no hole, it’s just a giant ball of super dense matter
So how do they explain the existing black holes? They were found based on the extreme gravity affecting the surrounding stars. Like the center of the milky way for instance. How does this new theory explain invisible small masses that can fling stars at half the speed of light?