Most physisicts and astronomers have taken it as a given that black holes exist. This study claims that they don’t which is a bit shocking. Here is more about their studies:
Black holes are some of the most extreme environments in space ever conceived by science and are also one of the most gripping visual effects in Nolan’s latest blockbuster hit. But according to astrophysicists Laura Mersini-Houghton and Herald P. Pfeiffer, they aren’t real.
This would disrupt a large majority of research and experiments based on this opinion.
Let’s find out more and watch the video on page 2
Next Page »
Pages: 1 2
Black holes and worm holes are not the same thing. A black hole is a place of immense gravity, while a wormhole is a place that connects two different points of space time together.
Pardon, I had meant white hole not worm hole, big fingers and small keypads cause errors. But thanks for responding.
This is actually just really bad science reporting. The article this all derives from is actually based on really bad math. It’s not even peer reviewed.
Those crazy scientists at CERN are laughing so bad at these two
@[1598346632:2048:Tye Brown]
Geoengineeringwatch.org
@[1806671440:2048:Tim Gray] ???
I’ve heard this but until I $#%&!@*ing love science posts it i cant trust it lol
Black holes actually do exist.
@[576715028:2048:James Keith Mowdy]
Hawking mentioned this last year. He contests whether or not black holes actually have Event Horizons. He suggests that they don’t. However, it doesn’t change the fact that a super m$#%&!@*ive en$#%&!@*y I’s propelling our galaxy through the universe (multiverse).
Black holes are not actually holes. I’m not sure if you were inferring that they were but it sounded like that. Does that help?
Yes, there have been and stars circling that super dense object are moving so rapidly and so closely that it presents the issue that even a neutron star of that m$#%&!@* would be easily visible with our telescopes.
It seems that this will be WIDELY discredited
Warning : click bait ahead!
@[100008963322915:2048:Troy Moore]
Tell the scientists to jump in a black hole and if they survive then I’ll believe them
Well hubble proved their existence… sooo
UH oh.
Please. We made a computer model that was unable to form them so they dont exist. Nevermind that massive thing that behaves exactly like a black hole in the center of our galaxy. Black holes are an inevitable result of enough mass accumulating in one location.
Just because you can’t computer model a black hole doesn’t mean they don’t exist, only that you don’t have the right data to model a black hole yet.
These brainiacs haven’t came to the conclusion there’s something wrong with there model- the program recreating something we don’t understand?- and its the universes fault- idiots-
That’s why the paper was submitted to a non-peer reviewed journal archive. A peer review would show the model was flawed…which is obvious to everyone.
Pretty sure they’ve been observed.
This proves my theory. Human know absolutely nothing except what they are told. Anything space related you have been told that a human being hasn’t seen and examined in real time is a guess. Everything you think you know can very well be a lie. This is what makes the universe so amazing. At any given time, anything can happen. We could all wake up tomorrow with wings and be able to fly. How in the hell can anyone tell you different? The possibilities are endless. Stop guessing and figure out how to get us there to figure it out instead of telling the public things don’t exist because your very limited computer tells you so. Even scientist are idiots sometimes.
If Black holes do not exist than what are the gravitational forces that hold solar systems and galaxies in place? If Hawking and Einstein say there are black holes…well then…there are black holes.
That’s right. Her paper should have been peer reviewed and not taken seriously until other scientists have the opportunity to review the data. So now a non peer reviewed paper gets released to the public just like a creationist paper.
I would have thought that if this idiot was going to put this out to the public they would at least gave some sort of alternative theory to the observed gravitational phenomena
but the fact that “nothing can escape a black hole” made it a factual phenomenon. but now they’re saying that light/energy DOES escape… I just think the energy gets re-routed to another time/dimension, and all of the escaping light/energy emitted, is just from another point in the multiverse.
You are so right…. Honestly, I’m laughing! Media, propaganda…. People are so easily influenced these days and don’t investigate, research, question anything anymore! Sad!
How could they know how to research anything? People today use the the word bea. Shows so much laziness and lack of intelligence. All they see is lies from politicians and learning how to tweark and whip nea nea. Stupid fads of soon to be yesteryear. At least when I was growing up up the 80’s the video showing idiocy was slim to none. People now will be regretting everything in 10years.
This doesn’t prove anything. Also, if energy disperse outwards as the paper claims, why is the star collapsing? If the energy is dispersing outwards, that would be called exploding not collapsing.I think there is good reason for the scientific community to have resistance on this paper mostly because the characteristics describe in the paper are not what is seen in collapsing stars. I think paper regards more of a supernova than it does black holes.
B.S! Yes they do.
Yes at the center of most galaxys.
Well supermassive blackholes don’t have enough gravitational pull to hold most galaxies together. They should actually false apart. That’s where dark matter and dark energy come into place, as to why a galaxy stays together. And for a solar system? Blackholes would destroy a solar system. Only thing holding solar systems together are Stars, just like our sun.
There are no bkack holes the center of the galaxy just sucks lol
Wait, no. Yes they don’t.
The center of each galaxy is full of suns revolving around each other and occasionally devouring each other no black holes no wormholes the end.
Sean….so is it the gravitional pull of the planets or stars that keep the conformity of solar systems and galaxies. Of this is the case and maybe it is…what are the entities at the center of galaxies?
i see black holes on the corner everyday
What keeps a solar system together is much different then what keeps a galaxy together. A solar system is held together by that systems star. What holds a galaxy together is still a theory. Black holes are a theory, dark energy and matter are a theory. This is what I know. Gravity is the weakest of the four forces. You can prove this by taking a paper clip, placing it on the ground, and taking a magnet. The electromagnetism of that little magnet just broke the earths gravity by picking up the paper clip. So with that said I do not think it’s possible for a black hole to be solely responsible for the entire rotation of a galaxy. I’m not saying black holes don’t exist, just saying there are probably multitudes of factors, some of which we may never understand. Lastly, a black hole would not destroy an entire solar system. It takes matter to make gravity, a black hole doesn’t gain any matter when it forms. Therefore it’s gravitational effect does not increase from the star that formed it. Our sun expanding to a red giant could kill us, the blast from the supernova could kill us, freezing from no heat could kill us, but if we somehow survived all that we would not perish from a black hole sucking us in. Only when you cross that event horizon does everything from light to us get fucked.
Wow… Nice call Josh. Copernicus, Galileo, Newton, Einstein, Hawking are just making up fairy tales. Are you that fucking stupid!?!?
So the moon landing was fake and the Mars missions are all a fabrication… I bet you think those pictures of Pluto we just got back are fake too. They have to be because by your stupid logic they just guessed how to put a man on the moon and a rover on Mars.
If you want to see what a limited computer looks like walk into your bathroom and take a look in the mirror because you sir are a fucking retard!!!
Wow Daniel, way to not comprehend the message of what I said and show your stupidity. You seem to be one of those individuals who believes everything they are told and read. You think a fucking computer is able to tell this so called scientist that black holes aren’t real? A piece of hardware that follows exactly what it is told just like your moronic$#%&!@* Nothing you think or claim to know is an original idea because you are one of those lemmings who believes what you read. That is if you are able to comprehend a message in what you read at all. Science is a wonderful thing. These people need to stop guessing randomly with a fucking program model and then placing the info out there for morons like yourself to see.
Going to make a guess you think the sky is fucking blue too? Moron the sky is clear. The light reflected through the ozone is blue. But you probably aren smart enough to understand that either.
So in the video it states that they used Hawkins radiation emissions from a black hole to show that it prevents one from forming…. Maybe I am a bit simple but that logic doesnt seem sound. Prove something doesnt exist based on the emission of the thing that doesnt exist….
if the core explodes once the density threshold is met then why doesn’t anomaly disappear? Perhaps the time differential relative to the outside universe causes the explosion to appear to slow down beyond the point of our perception? just a random thought…
How do you explain neutron stars and quasars then?! If a star sheds mass as it gets smaller then quasars and neutron stars would not exist.
Sometimes they think too hard and miss the answere right in front of there nose the whole time. Perhaps there simply such a large star or mass who’s gravitational polarity has reversed against the unknown force of what fills our auniverse. A mass where photons are on the inside being repelled by that opposite unknown force who’s affect we can only witness when a galaxy is spinning. Once that masses spin rate and mass exceeds the outside unknowns force it collapses into an opposite equal force not a singularity.
Einstein hated quantum physics!
Well why does it exist if people who didn’t use the entire concept of physics instead of just einsteins model? You can’t just use one piece of a puzzle to finish it?
No they are saying the emmision proves that it loses mass as it impacts on itself and then explodes. They aren’t saying they did it off a black hole model. They did it off another theory that there is no black hole so instead the emissions were really just off a planet exploding.